The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete this article and merge whatever's useful and not already there to the articles on the men and journals involved. The debate itself may well be notable, just not enough for an article on it separate to the participants. BigHaz 07:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete This should be in the biog article. --Michael Johnson 13:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete and merge per BigHaz. --Fang Ailitalk 20:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.