Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred buff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete as nn-bio. --GraemeL ^(talk) 15:00, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fred buff

Non-notable politician (claimed), nonsense entry, attack entry. Various reasons to speedy but listed here as anon author keeps removing speedy tags. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 14:02, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

attack? who? was not he mayor of James City County? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.230.229.13 (talk • contribs) 14:51 21 November 2005 (UTC)

why delete a us politician? all the links are correct .... support our politicians...a mayor is a mayor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.230.229.13 (talk • contribs) 13:57 21 November 2005 (UTC)

The article on Camp Perry has false and misleading information that is denied by the US government. The Camp Perry article should be set for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.230.229.13 (talk • contribs) 15:46 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Yes!! State politicians should be included. This helpesd me with researching state and local leaders. Let's keep this one. More local, that's the roots of democracy. Thank You Trent Jones 11/21/5 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.254.236.8 (talk • contribs) 2005-11-21 20:29:28 (UTC)

• delete I am an inclusionist when it comes to articles about politicians, because I also like to use wikipedia for research, I see absolutely nothing encyclopedic in this article. I see no indication of what the person has done which makes him notable. Morris 04:05, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as A7 (bio making no plausible claims of notability). It's a hoax, folks. For example, the article claims Fred Buff is "a leader of the Virginia Democratic Party". Too bad that the Virginia Democratic Party doesn't seem to have noticed... — Haeleth Talk 22:43, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Alberta

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.