Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Mascherino

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. W.marsh 14:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fred Mascherino

Fred Mascherino (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This seems to be a resource of unsourced or poorly sourced fancruft concerning a member of a band called Taking Back Sunday. I've tried redirecting to that article but this was reverted and cruft continues to be added. I suggest that the best course of action would be to redirect it to the band article and stick a protection on it. --Tony Sidaway 15:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep and clean up and he's non-notable how? I'm missing the point here. Whsitchy 22:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Notability isn't the issue, nor was it ever. The operative policy in this nomination is Verifiability. --Tony Sidaway 23:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
      • Then remove the unverified stuff, and stub the article, I see no reason to delete it. Whsitchy 00:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Cleanup if you're having problems with another editor, try some other solutions. I can't see why this would be deleted unless there's something specifically libelous in it. FrozenPurpleCube 04:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - the article might need some work, but he meets notability requirements. matt91486 23:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Clean up and keep. Notable, and deleting this article without deleting the articles of the four other band members will probably raise questions. Verifiability is an ongoing process for all articles, including this one. Amphy 04:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, the subject is clearly notable. That said, if we can't provide enough in the way of reliable sources, a redirect would be the correct action in the interim — as the nom should know this is an editorial decision which does not require deletion nor a deletion-related discussion. RFerreira 05:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.