Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Flintstone unit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fred Flintstone unit

Limited notability; Google search shows only 207 results [1], about a quarter of which appear to be Wikipedia. At best, this should be merged into English unit or some other article --Bletch 02:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable neologism. -- Mithent 02:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Mithent. Feezo (Talk) 03:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Mithent. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:25, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 06:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge or redirect to English unit. This is in fact an often used derogatory term for units used by the only non-metric countries left in the world (what are there, 1 or 2 still left?), especially with their own condescending attitude towards metric, claiming that their units are better just because they're older. JIP | Talk 07:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Lockley 07:25, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. --Terence Ong 10:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Nigelthefish 14:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, although I do like the term. James Kendall [talk] 16:25, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.