Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franz Josef Weern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:42, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Franz Josef Weern

This article has problems: 0 hits on Google, 0 hits on a Norwegian search engine (even though he lived 100 years ago, you would expect to find something). Furthermore, the author has a dubious edit history, and he provided us with a number of non-working interwiki links to make the subject look notable. To summarize: Delete, hoax. Punkmorten 22:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. --Aurochs
• Delete unless the author provides some source we can check. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 23:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax: there are no Norwegian baronetcies (nor, at the time in question, any Norwegian nobility). It is probably a safe assumption that everything by this contributor (User:TonyStilling) needs to be reverted or deleted. u p p l a n d 05:24, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Hoax, well spotted. Sam Vimes 13:42, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; his other contributions should be reviewed closely (Image:Heggedal.PNG is completely meaningless, Image:Heggedalmap.PNG is a fictive flag etc.). Cnyborg 20:01, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Why would anyone go to all this trouble to create an article without merit? It doesn't make sense --85.166.60.203 12:13, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Complete hoax. No such person. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:49, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.