Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank van Harmelen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 03:14Z

[edit] Frank van Harmelen

Frank van Harmelen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A professor. Has a reasonable number of publications (as you'd expect) but Factiva and Google News turn up nothing. Added by a WP:SPA Special:Contributions/Bonzodoggy

  • Delete no outside references about him.-MsHyde 20:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment appears at least notable due to these books , one of which has a bunch of Amazon editorial reviews that indicate it's being used in classroom settings. The "about the author" blurb He is a member of the joint EU/US committee on agent markup languages (who designed DAML+OIL), and is an active member of the W3C working group on Web Ontology languages, responsible for the OWL Web Ontology Language. He was the 2002 Program Chair of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, and will be the General Chair of the 2004 International Semantic Web Conference. sounds impressive enough. But the lack of sources is a problem. -SpuriousQ (talk) 20:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 22:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • keep books used in multiple universities are a sufficient criterion, based not just of precedent but the general conditions for N: multiple outside sources recognizing it. DGG 07:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • KEEP this guy is an influential international scientist and professor with many high-quality peer-reviewed publications, (see DBLP link) hence I don't think this page is a candidate for deletion .-User:Bonzodoggy
  • Keep per DGG. John Vandenberg 17:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per bonzodoggy. Duncan Hull
  • Keep and expand and put stub on the page. Someone has to expand the article. --MaNeMeBasat 14:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.