Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Terreri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 15:26, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Frank Terreri

Frank Terreri (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

this article is about litigation between Mr. Terreri, as plaintiff, and the United States, written solely from Mr. Terreri's perspective as if the allegations in the complaint were all true, with the only source a quote from the ACLU, who probably underwrote the litigation; it is so biased that it cannot be edited to neutrality, only a complete rewrite could achieve that goal; moreover as noted in prior tags and talk page comments, it is unsorced, a news story and not an encyclopedia article and its tone is inappropriate, those comments have been up for quite some time and no fix has occurred Jlawniczak (talk) 02:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete: Fails WP:BIO1E. Also, the POV. Oh God the POV. TallNapoleon (talk) 03:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. POV is not a reason for deletion. The article should be fixed and referenced, not deleted. --Eastmain (talk) 04:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, per WP:SOAP, and WP:NOT#News. MrPrada (talk) 06:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, filing a lawsuit does not make you notable. Also WP:BIO1E. The article is horribly WP:POV too, which doesn't help. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC).
  • Delete: This article has been a mess for a couple years now; there's no reason to think that will change, given that it's been orphaned by the creator (whose Wikipedia activity seems to have been based around a couple such articles).  RGTraynor  19:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.