Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Alcock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted by User:Angr. Flowerparty■ 22:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Frank Alcock

Delete. Vanity page. No more notable than typical academic.Still A Student 16:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

• No obvious claim to notability. Delete pending such claim. Regards, Ben Aveling 17:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete per nom. Edgar181 23:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Ben Aveling. Stifle 01:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Notable. Research publications. This article should not have been deleted, BTW. The discussion was closed prematurely. Mr. Pincus F. 06:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

  Any academic does. Heck, I have research publications. I assure you, it doesn't make me notable. :-) I agree that article should not have been deleted yet, though I think it will have come to the same thing in the end. Ben Aveling 18:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.