Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Wedge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Francis Wedge

I think this is a {{nn-bio}}, but since it has a picture and some links I put it up here. It is a bio of an 18th century farmer whose children are slightly more notable. Delete. Kusma (討論) 04:26, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 04:34, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'd say merge with the articles on her kids, but there's not really anything notable to say that isn't already on those articles. —Cleared as filed. 05:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. A newbie seems to be using WP for his family geneology. I speedied a shorter article on another family member. -R. fiend 05:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. *drew 05:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per the above, although for a short genealogical piece it is unusually nicely done (may be worth noting that the tide of opinion seems to be swinging towards keeping articles on the Australian members of the family (e.g., here).Staffelde 11:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Wedgeify - by which I mean sort the family into one article - useful historical data Brookie :) - a collector of little round things! (Talk!) 17:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
    • I wouldn't mind an article about the family - however, the contents of this article seem to be purely genealogy-style, and thus not worthy of inclusion. Wikipedia is not a collection of genealogical, and I don't think it should become one (I think there exists a wiki that does genealogy, but I forgot the name). Kusma (討論) 15:57, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.