Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Cavanaugh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Tone 11:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Francis Cavanaugh

Francis Cavanaugh (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Seems likely to be a hoax. Neither of the URL's listed work, neither do they produce any results on the Internet Archive and Google books and news seem to be completely unaware of any "Francis Alberto Cavanaugh" or "Francis Cavanaugh + Moran" or "Frank Cavanaugh + Moran".

Also nominating Lucas Cavanaugh (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) which appears to have the same issues. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete both, rather compelling evidence that both articles are hoaxes. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete both. Uh, yeah... like I'm gonna pay $9.95 to the cited source just to verify a Wikipedia article... --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 01:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete both Both articles seems to be hoaxes. The URL doesn't work. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Dont delete either oneMaybe it was written by their grandchildren...We can not tell,I know it is not the Wikipedia policy,but I think we should let it be,because it is clear that those man existed and and they were criminals indeed:just try typing "Francis Cavanaugh" into google and you`ll see tons of pages about the two of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.105.47.214 (talk) 02:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete both of these are un-verifiable based Google searches. Sorry, proud grandchildren of fictitious mobsters. --Lockley (talk) 06:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete until proper sources can be cited. TGreenburgPR (talk) 16:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.