Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franchette Dizon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Note that the sole author of this article has also subsequently requested that it be deleted here. HappyCamper 16:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Franchette Dizon

Not notable --Bottesini 17:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Ah, yes, another NN blogger who thinks that Wikipedia is a Myspace clone. Delete as vanity page. (And someone nail Chette Dizon, which redirects here.) RGTraynor 18:27, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as vanity. Grafikm_fr 18:46, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Apparently has a whole 51 fans. Delete. Fagstein 07:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Do not delete I think it should not be deleted. This girl is not just a blogger but a growing writer. I have known a school where she is really popular (the children using her writings as their reference). This is not just about the blog but the girl that will soon become popular. So I nominate it will not be deleted. But I don't think that's the case. Of course being her as a Christian she'll experience "Discrimination". --Kimber143 21:24, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Do not delete I did not put this woman information here for popularity or for my space thing. Why would I do that? The reason why I put her because like the person who said at the upper one, she is a growing writer and as I have told, someone had asked her from wincosin school to make a book about her. Although my vote of course is not to delete, I respect your words. But please do respect my article. --Lmae 21:36, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Do not delete Obviously you are not familiar with one IP add for this is a school Internet. I still think you should respect my article. It's not a porn or a bad information. So can you just leave this alone? --Lmae 02:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
    • You only get one recommendation. I have struck out the second one. Stifle (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BIO and WP:SPAM. Stifle (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

I will follow what she said. Obviously you guys don't respect other people. I thought Wikipedia is a free place. You should stop letting people contribute what they can. Because you guys are not fair. --Lmae 03:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment: I've always been bemused at the widespread belief that the meaning of the word "fair" is "letting me get my own way." Wikipedia isn't a "free place," per se -- it is a private encyclopedia with rules and guidelines for inclusion, and articles about people need to satisfy those criteria to be considered worthy of inclusion. We're not here to "respect other people," whatever that means. We're here to respect Wikipedia's rules. Take a look over WP:BIO for the criteria that apply in this instance. RGTraynor 14:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

go ahead and delete it already. Don't wait for five days anymore. --Lmae 03:34, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Hard to see how this is not a vanity page. Hardly notable either.--Cini 18:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete not notable. --MaNeMeBasat 13:55, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.