Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Cura'

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; kept. Johnleemk | Talk 09:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Francesco Cura' and Francesco Curá

Vanity Lancer Sykera 10:30, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Speedy as nn-bio (tagged). Jamie 10:48, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
    • OK, forget the speedy, since User:Magika and User:207.200.116.202 have been working on this like crazy. May still need to be deleted as NN -- let's see what the article evolves into. Jamie 12:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
      • Agreed, it continues to evolve into a better and better article. But yes, only time will tell. Lancer Sykera 12:05, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: if notability can be established, should be moved to "Francesco Curá" to conform to naming conventions. Jamie 12:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - actor in Passion of the Christ. That's good enough for me. Needs rewording though, to put claims of notoriety at the top. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 12:50, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Where did you get this? I don't see him listed on "Passion of the Christ"'s IMDB page. Jamie 12:59, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
      • On closer inspection, it appears to be a production of the same name for Italian television in the 1980s, with no connection to Mel Gibson. Chris talk back 13:30, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Not only is the SP&G not particularly good, it reads suspiciously like it might be a copyvio. Chris talk back 13:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and clean up. Seems notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 17:05, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete one, and vote on the other. --Simon Cursitor 08:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. -- JJay 21:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.