Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fractal animation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect. Punkmorten 06:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fractal animation

Article was prodded and expired the duration but seems good enough to deserve an AFD. Just listing here No Opinion from me. Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 15:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

• delete whilst it has some nice images I don't think there is enough depth in material to justify an article. What there is here could be merge into a section in the main fractal article. --Salix alba (talk) 15:29, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I prodded the article for the reason explained on its talk page: it is utterly irrelevant. One can "animate" a picture of a flower by panning over the image; this does not merit an article called Floral animation. The possibility of animating a seascape by shifting the image does not deserve an article Marine animation. Neither does doing the same with an image that happens to be a fractal. The article is completely unreferenced and qualifies as original research. The Google hits for the term refer to something rather different (and rather more interesting) than what it is described here, and for that reason I do not recommend a merge.  --Lambiam^Talk 21:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to fractal art. Nothing here is specific to fractals. Gazpacho 18:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

  I agree that Fractal art is a good redirection target.  --Lambiam^Talk 23:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete and redirect per Gazpacho. Maybe we can use some of these images elsewhere? Vectro 16:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

  I'll put a few of them into fractal art. Punkmorten 06:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.