Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert ^{T | @ | C} 21:54, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fox productions

I'm not really sure what this is supposed to be but it looks like some sort of correspondence. CambridgeBayWeather 04:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. I have no idea what it is either, but whatever it is, it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. If I could figure out what it is, I'd suggest that it be moved to Wikibooks. —Brim 04:40, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like some kind of lame promotion for some piece of software, but even so, it's non-notable. Peyna 04:47, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I'm not clear on what this is, but somehow I'm sure it needs to be deleted. --rob 11:23, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-encyclopedic, non-NPOV, and what's this at the end? 'do not copy or change unless you have complete permission to do so, if you wish to use the info written by fox, then all i ask is that you credit my hard work.' - Squibix 13:08, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unencyclopedic "how to"; appears to be some sort of legal-advice FAQ for file traders. It might belong on some other Wiki, but not here. MCB 21:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Copyvio - it's in Wikipedia, but it claims not to be usable under the terms of the GFDL... so it needs to be deleted quickly before the author's rights are infringed! :D — Haeleth Talk 22:17, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and file under "what the heck is this anyway?" 23skidoo 03:35, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: Perhaps after delete a re-direct to Fox Entertainment Group or something related would be appropriate. When I hear "Fox productions" I think TV and film production. --rob 03:40, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Incomprehensible stuff with bogus GDFL-incompatible legal notice. Doesn't belong here. jni 07:38, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.