Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forum 168

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. – ABCD^e✉ 23:46, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Forum 168

Verges on nonsense, but probably non-encyclopedic in any case. Delete. Catamorphism 21:48, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

It "verges" on nonsense for you because you are most likely not a member of neowin and have not spent time watching the inner-workings of the forum —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.14.230.180 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

It is something referenced by many in a group as the Forum 168. How could that not be worthy of a page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.76.9.61 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete or Merge Looks like the original afd was orphaned or deleted. It's a reference to an inside joke/myth on Neowin and should be merged with that article if anything. Jasmol 00:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• Merge to the Neowin article.--Aleron235 01:10, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• Merge and delete. Mandel 01:32, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. Merge and delete are not compatible votes. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete not salvagable and not encyclopedic. --MONGO 03:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It is an inside joke by Neowin subscribers and moderators that has no business here. Aleck79 05:00, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as unencyclopedic. If it needs to be covered, it should be in Neowin and nowhere else. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: Per MGM, if someone really, really, really wants to tell the same joke again, they can do it where it belongs, but the content is not important for the understanding of Neowin, so there is no actual need to merge, and it's unsearchable, so no need to redirect. Geogre 17:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Slashdot is better anyway :). Per nom, obviously. -^demon 18:08, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete it's a joke. - DavidWBrooks 21:52, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete; patent nonsense. Zazou 23:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Fancraft. Ashibaka tock 23:18, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete CSD G3. --Aurochs (Talk | Block)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.