Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortney & Scott, LLC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ryan Postlethwaite 03:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fortney & Scott, LLC

Fortney & Scott, LLC (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

non notable company Excariver (talk) 19:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

• Comment. The company seems to abbreviate its name to FortneyScott sometimes. Some references on Google News at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Fortney+%26+Scott%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8 and on Google at http://www.google.com/search?q=FortneyScott and http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Fortney+%26+Scott%22 suggest that the firm is well-known in certain circles, but I'm not sure that the evidence adds up to notability. --Eastmain (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Seems a sufficiently important law firm.DGG (talk) 22:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Non notable as far as I can see, only the author has contributed and originally written very much as an advert. Paste (talk) 13:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep, but only after I removed the cruft! Bearian (talk) 00:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.