Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Qualls

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 02:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fort Qualls

Fort Qualls (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

around 200 unique Google hits, nothing on Google News. Does not look to be independently notable. Guy (Help!) 22:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Neutral/Merge Might do to move it into a "counterprotest" section in Camp Casey. that, actually, might help to mend the neutrality (or apparent neutrality) problems of the Camp Casey article. Protonk (talk) 23:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per Eastmain. G-news comes up empty because it lists news from the last month by default; telling it to search all dates brings up numerous articles. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep seems to be some notability throughout news and google sources, thou it really needs some good sources and expanding.  Atyndall93 | talk  05:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Nick Dowling (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge into Camp Casey as this doesn't seem to have been notable in isolation. --Nick Dowling (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. No need to merge, it can be mentioned in Camp Casey, but should retain its own article. MrPrada (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.