Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Hill High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Wizardman 03:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fort Hill High School

Fort Hill High School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

unreferrenced, notability not demonstrated Mdbrownmsw 14:54, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 12:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• Merge - A high school is not notable as of itself. Consider merge into an article about the school district. Plm209^{(talk • contribs)} 13:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N as notability is not even asserted and WP:V as no asserted facts are cited to reliable sources. --Butseriouslyfolks 18:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, cleanup and expand. — RJH (talk) 19:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and possibly merge some info.--Svetovid 20:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep for my usual reasons. -- Necrothesp 00:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Dozens of state sports championships and multiple notable alumni add up to a strong claim of notability. Alansohn 20:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete nn school. Eusebeus 22:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Reply: Will you share a particular reason why you feel that this particular school is not notable, or is this one of the "no schools are notable, regardless of the number or quality of sources" votes? Alansohn 23:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment - the last two delete 'votes' will be ignored by any closing admin unless they are amplified to explain why the notability asserted and sourced in the article is not sufficient. TerriersFan 02:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
      • Closing admins would have to be quite new not to know the extensive arguments back and forth on this debate, but have no fear TF, Alan will helpfully note that my vote doesn't count, since, as he knows, I am nada mas than a committed deletionist intent on ruining wikipedia as part of the deletionists general plan for world domination. Eusebeus 19:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
        • I have never made any claims about world domination being sought. The rest, about "ruining wikipedia", is dead-on accurate. Will you share a particular reason why you feel that this particular school is not notable, or is this yet another one of the "no schools are notable, regardless of the number or quality of sources" votes? Alansohn 05:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - a high school with a long history, significant place in the community, notable athletics achievements and two notable alumni. TerriersFan 02:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - I'd say this is a fairly well fleshed out article, and there is little point in merging it, then splitting it back out when it is expanded. If you object to it's WP:IMPERFECT state, improve it yourself, or leave it alone. Dhaluza 17:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as inherently notable, as I argue here. Noroton 14:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC) -- added link Noroton 23:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Apathetic Keep. Although I don't subscribe to the whole "all schools are notable" garbage. I think that this article would have been better off with an expand tag than a deletion. I think that there is material here to suggest at least enough notability to warrant a rewrite and then reexamine it at a later time per WP:N. Trusilver 03:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.