Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forms in architecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DS 20:46, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Forms in architecture

A rambling, unreferenced essay that appears to be entirely unrelated to the actual topic. Circeus 21:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 22:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: Interesting idea, probably encyclopedic and notable, but this essay does not come close to even being a stub. I think the nom probably meant to write that it is unrelated to the topic. Bearian 18:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
  • ACK! yes *fixes*. I would honestly not nominate it if it actually, y'know made sense, but this is, as far as the topic is concerned, absolutely unsalvageable, so a clean slate is probably the best course. I probably could have speedied it, but I felt safer going through AFD. Circeus 18:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.