Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forming fluid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The arguments raised about "we need a stub to start with" didn't answer the "but this violates WP:NOT". Daniel 05:51, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Forming fluid

Forming fluid (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, henceforth, this should be transwikied or deleted --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 16:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per above, not a dictionary Corpx 17:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Katherine Tredwell 17:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Seems to me to be a valid stub on a subject that could have an encyclopedia article written about it. JulesH 19:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Bearian 20:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - this is a valid stub article. We need to start out with a stub if we're going to have an article ever created. The Evil Spartan 18:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Move to Wikitionary Giggy _U^CP 22:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. I have no idea of the exact meaning of this article from the American Institute of Physics but it seems like a legit process appropriate for an encyclopedia. Canuckle 22:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete use the dictionary. --Storm Rider ^(talk) 04:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.