Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreverworld Designs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 17:50, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Foreverworld Designs

This design community is quite small, there is nothing notable about it, and the only source of "history" I can find is from their own website. There are only a handful of Google links [1], and the Alexa rating is pretty low too [2]. That said, the real reason this should go is that there is nothing special about it, it's just another design community and there isn't much mention of it elsewhere on the internet. Also, a valid article can't be written because there are no third-party sources of information and history. I vote delete as not notable and unverifiable. Foofy 20:05, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

• Appears to be self-advertizing, so delete. Stifle 01:51, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete — advert. — RJH 01:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete First person writing suggests Stifle is correct. Peyna 05:29, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.