Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forensic epistemology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Forensic epistemology

A google search turns up very little on "forensic epistemology" other than WP mirror sites. The concept was apparently introduced in an unpublished doctoral thesis. The references provided do not substantially relate to the topic. Citation of peer-reviewed publications which discuss forensic epistemology would probably be sufficient to establish notability. Nesbit 16:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete; looks like original research. --Allen 17:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Agree that it looks like original research, but it seems it might be improved to overcome that problem. Legal epistemology belongs at evidence (law), which could stand expansion. Still, I look forward to the day when an epistemologist testifies as an expert witness in a trial. Smerdis of Tlön 19:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unless such publications are provided, this is either a non-notable, or unverifiable topic. If no one else can be bothered to write about it, why should we?--Crossmr 06:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• delete OR essay Pete.Hurd 03:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.