Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreign film
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to World cinema -- Flyguy649 talk 03:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Foreign film
The article world cinema itself notes that both terms are interchangeable. This article is vague (what exactly counts as "foreign"?), and much of it seems to be used simply to defend foreign films themselves ("French films have been at the fore front of innovation and experimentation since film's inception"). Finally, the world cinema article is quite detailed and already covers the term "foreign film" much more thoroughly than this article. DearPrudence (talk) 23:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Frag Well elucidated. World cinema is the better choice to settle these redundancies. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 23:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect. Holy schnitzel, movies are made in places other than Hollywood?! </sarcasm> Redirect to world cinema, I suppose - "foreign film" is a relative term, anyways. Zetawoof(ζ) 23:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect. "Foreign film" is a very relative term, and the other article already has this subject covered. PC78 (talk) 23:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect. Thanks for the laugh, Zetawoof! Reywas92Talk 00:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Meaningless title. Every film is a foreign film to most people, and there's no content here worth merging anywhere. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
