Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forced chastity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Chastity belt. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-18 08:48Z

[edit] Forced chastity

Forced chastity (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Completely anecdotal, no reliable sources for either the concept or the term. WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:NEO apply. Sandstein 18:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

  • I agree, anecdotal, and the only verifiable aspect of it is already dealt with in detail in the erotic sexual denial article. Delete -- The Anome 18:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Same thing is adequately covered in other articles such as Chastity belt. This article is redundant and lacks multiple independent and reliable sources. Inkpaduta 21:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Chastity belt. --UsaSatsui 19:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Agree I agree with this redirect. --Ozgod 23:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as it's WP:OR and just a plain neologism hence violates WP:NEO too. The things they think off. IZAK 05:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Inkpaduta Avi 07:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • merge with erotic sexual denial this group of articles are a mess; the terms mean a whole range of things, and the articles are apparently written by the use of guesswork and partial personal knowledge. (But Chastity belt is a real article on its own, and is a rather large topic if everything available was included, since it has a substantial historical literature.) I would not really object to putting this into erotic sexual denial, and rewriting it. In case not all of it is really included, so i've userfied the text. DGG 05:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)DGG 05:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.