Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foot job

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to foot fetishism. I'd do this, except the article is unreferenced, so I'm redirecting. Material can be merged when referenced.. Docg 11:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Note: I've been bold and changed the redirect to point to Non-penetrative sex, since IMO that's a more useful target given the current contents of the two articles. Feel free to revert if you disagree. Doc's remarks about merging with references (to either article) still apply. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Foot job

Foot job (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is going to be a more borderline AfD, but I do not think that this topic has any independent notability from foot fetishism. It warrants a mention there if someone can find a reliable source, but that's about it. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 18:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge with foot fetishism. It's mildly conceivable that there might be potential for an encyclopedic article about this, but as it is, it's more or less a dicdef. SparsityProblem 18:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment from the internet, it seems this is popular in Japan. 132.205.99.122 20:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • comment is there a second party physical penis stimulation article to merge it to, if not, then Keep ? 132.205.99.122 20:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge into foot fetishism. The article does suggest that it's sometimes part of foreplay among people without foot fetishes, but that's presumably true of any kind of penile stimulation. It's only in the context of foot fetishism that this is likely to be notable enough for a description. EALacey 20:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I vote for the Merge into foot fetishism. 82.153.19.100 21:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge:foot fetishism. Tiptoety 23:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect Pavel Vozenilek 11:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge into foot fetishism. --Simon Speed 17:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge per almost everyone else here. Rray 23:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge into foot fetishism. --Man from the Ministry (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep; do not merge. No reason for deletion or merge as Handjob already exists. Prior "merge" and "delete" votes have, variously, either no valid reasoning or no reasoning at all behind them. Badagnani (talk) 08:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.