Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fool (The Fallen Angel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. No Guru 02:54, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fool (The Fallen Angel)
I can't find confirmation that such a character exists; he's supposed to come from a footnote in the New Testament. Delete unless verified. GTBacchus(talk) 20:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete There are no footnotes in the New Testament. Fan1967 20:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. PJM 20:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per above... Grafikm_fr 20:36, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Funky Monkey (talk) 01:29, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- I originally put the article up for prod with the following comment "I can find no mention of a Demon or an Angel called Fool in 'The New Testament of the King James Bible'. I've also performed extensive searches on the Internet and on my angel/demon listings without luck. Unless someone can cite it I think the page should be deleted, I have already informed the author". The author seemed quite certain that a reference existed despite this, which tends to make me believe it may exists in some obscure text. I agreed it was worth keeping at least for a period of time to see if anyone expands it. It has only been up a few months so is relatively new, though I guess it would be easy enough for someone to recreate later if it was removed being only a stub. -- Shimirel (Talk) 23:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment If some verifiable source can be found (which I doubt) then the article can be recreated with the source being cited. Without verification, it should be deleted. Fan1967 21:32, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.