Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Food & Wine Magazine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Shanel 01:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Food & Wine Magazine

Purely an advertisement for the magazine, created by User:FoodWine. Delete. Meh per Postdlf. I mean, keep the rewritten stub. Fang Aili 19:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom, unless external evidence of its notability can be shown. Death to all advertisers. Postdlf 19:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Meh. Postdlf 02:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep It's true that this article reads like an advertisement. But there certainly are magazines that are notable enough to have Wikipedia articles, and I think F&W may be one them. Edgar181 20:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep & rewrite . — Adrian Lamo ·· 20:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I removed the advertising and turned the article into a stub. No Guru 21:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Basically just a re direct...doesn't tell us abou the history of the magazine, famous articles, subscription base and contact info etc... KsprayDad 21:10, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment. True but out of tiny stubs can mighty articles grow. No Guru 21:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as stub. -- Krash (Talk) 21:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • keep. no apparent problems. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep seems fine as stubs go... Localzuk (talk) 22:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. --Tone 23:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per No guru Eivind 00:03, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Stubby, but genuine (though I don't read it, preferring Gourmet and Saveur). --Calton | Talk 04:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.