Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Follow-up

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect. Please smooth over as necessary.  ;-) Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Follow-up

Subject does not warrant its own article (merge with Fagan inspection). Title is ambiguous and there is no context, so if kept I recommend moving the page and adding {{context}}. HappyDog 17:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. 129.98.212.164 19:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect. There's a separate page for requested mergers. No deletion required. - Mgm|^(talk) 22:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Follow-up is a very general term, and should not be redirected to Fagan inspection after the content merge. Espresso Addict 23:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Fagan inspection. Should never have got to AfD. JASpencer 21:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Fagan inspection, but don't redirect. This isn't AfD material. Michael Kinyon 11:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.