Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foiba

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn with consensus to keep. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Foiba

Foiba (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Doesn't seem to be a notable term; little more than a dicdef. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Withdrawn The {{notability}} tag had me swayed that it wasn't notable. Added references are now sufficient for a stub on this object. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

  • keep. This article is about a thing, not about a word, hence it is not a dicdef, even it is a stub which looks like a dicdef. Please think a little bit about this distinction, since as I understand you are quite active in AfD. As for notability, oh yes it is very notable in certain contexts. `'Míkka>t 23:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • keep. Mikkalai is right. This is about a natural geographic formation in the Balkans--a huge sinkhole. So, it is noteworthy in its context--and that is the point about the article--and also for its role sadly as a convenient burial ground for various participants during WWII--including the Axis powers. Artene50 (talk) 01:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Noteworthy especially in the historical context (see e.g. it:Foiba). --Eleassar my talk 05:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, although I don't feel the article as improved to this point sufficiently distinguishes it from a local synonym of sinkhole or karst (or kettle (landform), although those are glacial and there's no indication in our article of how foibe are believed to have been formed). --Dhartung | Talk 06:19, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep I'd agree with TenPoundHammer (and the applicable otters) that it's pretty close to a dicdef, but I think it has good potential to expand beyond that. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 06:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. A real thing, sourced, notable, more than one meaning, more than just a dicdef. KleenupKrew (talk) 10:11, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.