Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog Creek Copilot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. User:Sir Lewk is a real user, not a sock puppet, even though is keep vote was first added by an anonymous IP. Therefore 2 delete votes versus 1 keep vote is too narrow a margin. — JIP | Talk 08:01, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fog Creek Copilot

Brand new, just launched in August and seems pretty NN. Devotchka 21:23, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

• Probably slightly notable because of Joel on Software. DJ Clayworth 21:25, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete but open to persuasion - Just zis Guy, you know? 21:46, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, doesn't really seem like an advertisment to me, relatively notable.--Lewk_of_Serthic 04:35, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete article makes no claim for notability, reads like ad copy (talks too much about how and why users buy 24hr unlimited day pass from Fog Creek Copilot's website to fix their computers). Pete.Hurd 07:24, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

• Comment:" The article doesn't seem to make any attempt to establish critical differences between this and Microsoft's inbuilt remote assistance. Some indication of how many users / sites are covered might help in establishing whether it is worthy of note. - Just zis Guy, you know? 12:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.