Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fof

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 01:01, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fof

Non-notable. Zero Google hits. Denni☯ 01:42, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)

• Delete bandity. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:58, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, notability not established. Mr Bound 02:18, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, but politely: At least there isn't a wikilink of both names or outrageous claims. The band has not established enough significance at this point for an encyclopedia article (no records, no contract, no distribution). We are a tertiary reference source, so everything has to be verifiable. Geogre 02:49, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete band vanity. JamesBurns 10:29, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• "FOF is a small band from Portland, Oregon." "Small" is the key word there. Delete Matjlav 14:38, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete inoffensive, but vanity. --Etacar11 16:34, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - it is one of the less annoying "bandity" entries, but still... StopTheFiling 23:06, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete- vanity page, nothing notable. --Rschen7754 02:09, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.