Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fodera Bass

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 13:20, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fodera Bass and Fodera

Blatant advertising. RickK 08:21, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete advertising it is. Mgm|^(talk) 10:49, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
• keep why not just 'fix' the text? i didn't write it, just tried to make it less of a mess. Paster 16:54, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• keep/merge into Fodera. I think Fodera was supposed to be influential in developing the six string electric bass (will need to research). Atsi Otani 08:35, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • There was originally only the Fodera article, but the only thing in it was a subcategory called "Fodera basses" where the text now in "Fodera bass" was in; i just tried to organize things a bit. and i'm planning on adding things to both articles, as soon as i have the time. if i recall correctly there's a story of fodera basses on victor wooten's website. Paster 04:45, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. Agree with Atsi Otani. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 09:39, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. Agree with Atsi Otani Johntex 21:56, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
• While there is probably too much puffery here, Fodera did make the first 6-string electric bass with low B string (for Anthony Jackson) so has a place in the history of the evolution of this instrument.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.