Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foamhenge (Stockton Down)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge & redirect. — Scientizzle 15:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Foamhenge (Stockton Down)
Non-notable prop made for a TV show. Googling Foamhenge + "Stockton Down" confirms the lack of notability. Saikokira 01:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete no significant coverage that I can find, and (for non-UK editors) "subject of a programme on Channel 5" is a lot less impressive than it sounds, since at no point in the last year did their audience share rise above 5.5%. To preempt the WP:WAX arguments, Carhenge does have genuine multiple independent significant sources — iridescenti (talk to me!) 16:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Stonehenge replicas and derivatives#Foamhenge. There's no reason this needs its own article. Someguy1221 22:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 23:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect per some guy. -- RHaworth 00:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect per suggestion by Someguy1221. Sr13 (T|C) ER 03:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect per Someguy1221. ~ G1ggy! ...chatterbox... 09:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect per suggestion by Someguy1221.SlideAndSlip 11:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The information in this article already exists in Stonehenge replicas and derivatives, so more merging isn't necessary, it can just be turned into a redirect.Saikokira 01:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect, etc... --Infrangible 02:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
