Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fnatic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fnatic

• Delete vanity piece/non npov/WP:CORP, straight copy from own website --Djith 20:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• This was originally blanked as a copyvio but Zro and 84.228.184.131 reverted it. I have restored the copyvio tag. Stifle 21:06, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Okay, it's not a copyvio per new postings on the talk page. Delete as non-notable and advert instead. Stifle 00:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - while I believe that it's not a copyvio, I do think it's non-notable wikispam. --Whouk (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, author claims to own the web site, but appears determined to fill the article with promotional fluff rather explaining what the company actually does. If the company's own web site can't explain it who else can? Gazpacho 07:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advert. Incognito 02:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as Vanispamcruftisement -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 00:04, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.