Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly like a Raven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-26 15:00Z

[edit] Fly like a Raven

Fly like a Raven (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

First line says it all "the RUMORED fourth studio...", the entire thing is one giant uncited, rumored, crystal ball, complete with fan art album covers. WP:NOT crystal ball, WP:V, WP:OR, etc. ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 09:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Total crystal ball, topped off by the addition of the fan art album cover. Viridae^Talk 09:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I still have moments of vertigo trying to imagine articles like this in a print encyclopedia. Charlie 09:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 09:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Arrgh! delete delete delete. yandman 09:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ridiculous article: complete fancruft and OR. Moreschi ^Deletion! 10:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete if it's going to be released it will be out well before our publication deadline, so we can afford to wait. Guy (Help!) 10:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Crystalbollocks. --Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 12:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete well intentioned but mind boggling article. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NOT a crystal ball, along with the obviously hackjobbed album cover. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and not-a-crystal-ball-R-us. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP is no crystal ball. TSO1D 23:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not place for Crystal Ball. Daniel5127 <Talk> 08:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unreferenced crystal balling. —ShadowHalo 22:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Senseless and unverifiable. -- Thesocialistesq/M.Lesocialiste 23:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, PLEASE! This has gone on far enough. A few eleven-year-olds got together and came up with this one. Rhythmnation2004 19:28, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.