Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flutchue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Flutchue

This article has been speedied twice as patent nonsense (which it's technically not, patent nonsense being gobblygook-type stuff) and deleted by prod once. It'd go by prod again, but if we get a solid AfD on it, it can be quickly speedied as db-repost. Google hits reveal nothing, and none of this is verified as required. Besides that, it's a dictionary definition, which is, without additional info, prohibited by policy.--Kchase T 08:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom - not patent nonsense, but patently silly. BigHaz 08:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and protect it against re-creation. wikipediatrix 11:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as silly dicdef. Septentrionalis 13:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, my opinion is that it is patent nonsense, but will go with nom. NawlinWiki 14:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fantasy neologism. Nuttah68 15:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fg2 00:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.