Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluid management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete due to concerns about copyright violations/plagiarism/spam. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fluid management

Fluid management (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This appears to be a spam page for OilSafe products. Parts are a reword from here while others are a reword from here. I am at a loss on how to salvage this for the encyclopedia. Spryde 14:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, maybe even a speedy delete as a thinly-veiled copyvio of [1] or as a G11 spam page. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 16:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, but rewrite and expand. I was able to find journal articles and NASA articles on fluid management as well as multiple businesses named Fluid Management, so there is an article to be written using these sources, as these are reliable sources and they indicate the phrase's notability. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 16:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Comment I would agree totally, maybe if I or someone else can find time later today I will stub it and ref it. But the current form has to go. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spryde (talk • contribs) 11:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, is obviously spam. ffm 17:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.