Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flirt fruit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Flirt fruit

Flirt fruit (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:NOTE and strangely even WP:V, since there are no independent sources indicating that this does exist[1],[2]. If no one has ever written about it, Wikipedia is not the place to start doing that. We are a tertiary source, not a secondary one. Fram 07:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete unattributed and non-notable. Carlosguitar 10:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Well, Aldi does have some exclusive foods (I have a box of their tea), but I can't imagine what can really be said about them, making this article unexpandable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC
  • Delete Non notable sweets, and the article doesn't cover any information, and how do we know these sweets exist? (Clawsofmidnight 16:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC))
  • Keep if reliable sources can be located, otherwise delete for now. Yamaguchi先生 02:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Both Aldi and Lidl have numerous 'knock-off' products effectively copied from brand-name rivals and other cheap (as in affordable) products sold from their stores. There's no indication that these are more notable than Starblind's tea bags (which I hope is not opening a tin of WP:BEANS) >.< Someone another 12:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete with no legit Ghits (porno-related don't count ;) and no other reliable sources... SkierRMH 02:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. For all we know this is a Photoshopped hoax. Where are the sources? Burntsauce 16:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.