Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flicky (bird)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep based on discussion. Wizardman 14:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Flicky (bird)

Flicky (bird) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a character page with no assertion of real world information or notability. This also cites NO SOURCES. -- ZeroGiga (Contact) 00:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 16:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jonny-mt 07:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• so tag it... (Keep) - Far from the least of Wikipedia articles, when one looks at things like tar baby, cooties, Fish of Oklahoma (a list page... argh!), fuzzy dice, and the multitudes of other tiny, unreferenced, non-notables, this one stands out as a good article at least in its formatting and decent, non-stub size. Not being bound by paper encyclopedia limitations, why shouldn't we keep this? Marginal, yes, but absolutely keep-able. VigilancePrime (talk) 07:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.