Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flergle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily Deleted This article has been speedily flurgled as nonsense.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Flergle

Neologism, word made up in school one day. -- Koffieyahoo 00:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, doesn't even have a real definition. Morgan Wick 01:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Wow... Not only a neologism, it doesn't have a definition! Its as close to nonsense as you can with an attempted neologism. Kevin_b_er 01:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete I was on the fence between normal and speedy, but Kevin's vote tipped the scales. -- Kicking222 01:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete and so tagged. NawlinWiki 01:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. This article is doomed for deletion. Aplomado ^talk 01:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Deletion - I agree that it's doomed for deletion but I don't see that it's patent nonsense. - Richardcavell 01:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: it's pretty stupid, but I don't think that it counts as patent nonsense because it is not incoherent. -- Kjkolb 01:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete despite posibility that it doesn't count as patent nonsense. Artw 02:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- Vary | Talk 02:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Someone's pathetic dorm room joke probably wasn't even notable to them. References anyone? I thought not. george 02:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Wikipedia is not the Encyclopedia of Words You Just Made Up and Didn't Even Bother to Think of a Definition For. --Metropolitan90 03:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete because flergle. Danny Lilithborne 03:20, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete please Flergel. --Starionwolf 03:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not only no definition but no references! --Brother William 03:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete this neologism. --Coredesat 04:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.