Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flashturbation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 01:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Flashturbation

Flashturbation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Slang dicdef. No reliable sources, and it has been tagged with 3 cleanup tags for months, to no avail. There is no reason to believe that this article will ever be more than an unverifiable dictionary definition. *** Crotalus *** 03:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as simple neologism CitiCat 03:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not for things made up while waiting for your page to load one day. YechielMan 03:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Article that contains neologism should be deleted. Daniel 5127 03:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Lord Sesshomaru
• Delete, one sees this in web design circles, but there's hardly more to say about it even if it's reliably sourceable. Get those Jakob Nielsen digs in elsewhere. --Dhartung | Talk 04:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. One of the moost interesting words I've ever heard. But still completely unverifiable. Someguy1221 04:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I found a non-reliable source dated of 2000. [1] Yet article seems to be neologism. Carlosguitar 06:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination. -- The Anome 06:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete yet another WP:NEO. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 07:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as cringeworthy made-up word whose own usage is listed by its glossary as "Slang term seldom used among web desigers.^[sic] " kind of speaks for itself. tomasz. 10:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per WP:NEO, belongs on UrbanDictionary. —MrSomeone ^{( tlk • cntrb )} 23:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete it, recreate it, then delete it again, just to be sure. JJL 00:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.