Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flame Icejin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 18:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Flame Icejin
Delete as non-notable fan-fiction. Only 66 "unique" results on Google, and they all appear to be self-submitted with no secondary references. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 12:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- Delete, per above. The Clawed One 21:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. DWaterson 23:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I thought that Wikipedia would have a Flame Icejin article. It talks about a fanfiction series that I created. Please, do not delete the article. ~~LDEJRuff~~ (talk) 22:00, 27 August 2007 (EDT)
- Uh, no. Self-created unimportant fanfiction is not grounds for an article. Do you see any article on Inuyasha's "Purity" series? The Clawed One 16:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- No, I don't. ~~LDEJRuff~~ (talk) 9:32, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
- Then why should there be an article on this series? The Clawed One 13:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:N. Answer to above rhetorical question: We won't, shortly. --Bfigura (talk) 21:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- However, there is an article on a webcomics site maintained by SnafuDave called Snafu Comics. ~~LDEJRuff~~ (talk) 11:45, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
-
- Comment Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for a discussion of how to make persuasive arguments in an AfD debate. --Bfigura (talk) 16:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.