Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five-Sixty Recordings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Five-Sixty Recordings

Five-Sixty Recordings (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article fails to meet Wikipedia:Notability (music) Hirolovesswords 14:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as entirely non-notable. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TKD::Talk 08:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete No coverage from multiple, secondary sources. The band that founded the label was even deleted in an AfD. Spellcast 09:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Even the article itself implies that it is non-notable. --WebHamster 15:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The only act that has a record with Five-Sixty Recordings is a red link which makes it even less notable.--JForget 23:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.