Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Century Christians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Early Christianity. Mailer Diablo 14:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] First Century Christians

little or no info that is not already covered in Christians --Pboyd04 00:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete if most of the material is already covered in Christians. --Bill (who is cool!) 00:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, more in-depth info is available in a subsection of Christians. -- H·G (^words/_works) 01:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete & redirect - there is a perfectly fine article at Early Christianity not yet mentioned... — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib Reverts} 02:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• RE-Direct ^^ -- Librarianofages 02:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete history and redirect to Christians or Early Christianity. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect per above. SynergeticMaggot 05:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and Redirect to Early Christianity per Revragnarok. --Wine Guy Talk 09:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to Early Christianity — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 10:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and Redirect to the fine article at Early Christianity, as per Revragnarok's comments. Scorpiondollprincess 14:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect as above JungleCat Image:Texasflaginstate.png 15:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete then create a redirect. This article looks like an attempt at a POV fork. BigDT 18:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Comment I'm assuming GF on this article. It wasn't until this AfD that I went and added the EC link to the main Christianity article. It hadn't been there...??? — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib Reverts} 18:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't think the contributor was intentionally causing harm by creating the article ... that's not what I'm saying at all ... but when I read statements like "The First Century Christians were different from the Christians of today in many ways" without qualification, it sounds like the start of a POV fork ... just because someone creates a POV fork doesn't mean that they are acting in bad faith. BigDT 18:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect & Merge what is necessary, if anything. Srose (talk) 18:33, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect per above. Alphachimp ^talk 23:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.