Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Firre

Delete. Non-notable, appears made up - zero google hits. Tufflaw 06:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep with the intent for development. Whoever gets "0" hits on Google did not try very hard. I got 612,000 but that should not determine viability alone. Kmac1036 08:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Needs major clean up and sources. My brief investigations sugests this term is not used by the army, but by one company (Force Protection Systems) for their system. If true, this may turn into an advert. I hope the author can clean up. If there are no sources that show this is a general term, then I'd go with delete. Oh, and perhaps it should be renamed to FIRRE.Obina 12:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I get several hits on Google. [1] and [2] (scroll to the mid-bottom of the 2nd link]. [3] is also a good resource and there are more... --Naha|^(talk) 20:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. Obviously most of the Google hits for "firre" are not related (and Kmac1036, I only get 30,000; don't know how you get 612,000). Zero google hits for "Family of Integrated Rapid Reaction Equipment", but 133 Google hits for "Family of Integrated Rapid Response Equipment". Here is one reference: [4]. I have changed the name in the article. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-02 21:25Z
• Weak keep per above Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 08:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.