Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire and ice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was move to Fire and Ice (documentary) and clean up. · Katefan0^(scribble) 21:35, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fire and ice

Advertising, but listed here because it might clean-up into something... but then might become just non-notable. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 12:14, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as spam. There appears to be a possibly notable animation of this name, but this is not it. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 12:28, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Move or delete. No opinion on whether the content is salvageable, but this title should be redirected to Fire and Ice afterwards. —Cryptic (talk) 13:04, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep as the film is probably worthy of an article, but needs to be cleaned up to remove advertising copy. It also needs to be renamed so it isn't the same as the disambiguation page and isn't confused with the Frank Frazetta animated film, which is undeniably notable. 23skidoo 22:19, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Winter War where a "Media" section can be added with a brief summary of this documentary. — RJH 15:51, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep and clean-up. Bowever, it must be moved into "Fire and ice (documentary)" or something, because Fire and Ice is already a disambig page. If it is kept, it should be mentioned there. If it is not kept, it should be made into a redirect to Fire and Ice. — JIP | Talk 19:45, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.