Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire and Steel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 01:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fire and Steel

Vanity. (Author's only work. Only one author, except one edit. Non-notable.) Skyscrap27 14:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

• Ther are at least 144 unique google hits on ("Fire and Steel"+ reenactment). The organization is apparently invloiced in rtegional and some wider activities. Re-enactment and living histroy in general are very notable activities, adn this socitiey seems to be ate least soemwhat notable in those fields. Weak keep. DES ^(talk) 17:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• weak keep per DES or redirect to Australian Men Without Girlfriends MNewnham 19:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Stifle 01:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Delete I am curious exactly how many people are involved. I'm not yet convinced whether this is more notable than my good friend's mother's bridge club, which has 40 or 50 members, yet is not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. I don't know that 144 google hits is notable. --Habap 13:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. The article itself describes this as a "local club." --Thunk 19:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete local, small, nn vanity WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 21:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity Pintele Yid 22:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.