Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Fantasy: Dark Chronicles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 13:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Final Fantasy: Dark Chronicles

Final Fantasy: Dark Chronicles (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Found while clearing out CAT:CSD. Deletion reason was -- non notable fan game. This is not a valid speedy deletion reason. Therefore I nominated this to afd. Opinions on what to do with this? No Stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 09:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - A whole lot of crystal ballery. Fan-game projects based on existing big-money franchises rarely last long into their development before the lawyers send in the cease-and-desist orders. An uncompleted, unpublished fan game will almost certainly not have those all-important third-party, non-trivial sources for verifiability. Zero Google hits for "Dark Chronicles" "Ghost Game Productions". ~Matticus ^T_C 10:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Article is one big advert for a non-released fangame. "The game was started in July, 2006 and is scheduled for release in December 2007." Crystal-ballery to boot. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable fan game, unsourced and unverifiable crystal ballery, fails WP:SOFTWARE. MER-C 13:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - This article was speedy deleted yesterday and re-added this morning, I think perhaps that should've been the reason for speedy deletion. Timkovski 14:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • It was speedy deleted as spam, and contained maybe one or two sentences that were "spammy" in nature, so I think that was a bit weak reason to delete it. Not really any worse than this revision; I think this one is even less spammy in tone. While it won't save the article, I say we go through AfD process just for the heck of it. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. —Wrathchild ^(talk) 18:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - Apalling crystal ballery, I'm amazed how little information they have, yet can take up so much room on a page! The Kinslayer 18:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Rather nasty looking stub, if some decent information can be added I'll change my position. --MegaBurn 20:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fan game, and not even close to beinf released, either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable, 9 hits on Google, reads like a advertisement, pure vanity. Havok (T/C/e/c) 07:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Uh... someone's RPGMakerXP epic that is released next year. Or maybe the year after that. Maybe. Not yet worthy an article, sorry; welcome back if it becomes a sneaky mega-hit it once it's released... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Matticus. NeoJustin 22:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete fan game, the end. Danny Lilithborne 22:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.