Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filthy Animals (comic)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Filthy Animals (comic)

Filthy Animals (comic) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-Notable publication. Was not widely released and was only a 4 issue comic released in 1997. Search on Altavista, Google and Yahoo only turns up hits results for the now defunct WCW wrestling team Filthy Animals and less then 10 results for the comic book. Feldman's Ghost 06:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - Article makes no assertion of notability. --Hyperbole 07:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - per nom and in agreement with Hyperbole no assertion of notability. Simon Bar Sinister 07:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No independent coverage. - Revolving Bugbear (formerly Che Nuevara) 14:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:N. No coverage from secondary sources. Doctorfluffy 05:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no reliable sources, no assertion of notability, this is just another four issue furry porn (or 'poon') comic among the millions that (shouldn't) exist (but do.) - ∅ (∅), 13:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Significant publication which WAS widely available and advertised. I also feel that this article is being picked on by conservative Wikipedia users who are anti-pornography. Agesthird 01:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)— Agesthird (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. —Hiding Talk 11:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete doesn't assert notability. If someone feels strongly about this sandbox it and work on it and then let the webcomic work group know and we'll have a look at it and see if it shapes up. (Emperor 16:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC))


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.