Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ffffpppptthheeewww

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was 'already deleted. SYSS Mouse 13:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ffffpppptthheeewww

No Google hits and an unsearchable title anyway; twice nominated for speedy deletion as nonsense, which as far as I can see it isn't, and a disputed prod. Likely a joke; besides, this is more the sound he makes when he shoots webs. :-) CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 00:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete Danny Lilithborne 00:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The title became very funny when I read the article. But it's unverfiable, and not really encylopedic. Should be in WP:BJAODN. Yanksox ^(talk) 00:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Yikes. My delete sense is tingling. Is anybody ever likely to type that exact phrase, with the same number and order of Fs, Ps, Ts, Hs, Es and Ws, as a search term? ~ Matticus78 00:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Oh, and the article's creator removed the delete tags three times. A sorry joker if I ever saw one (wait, the Joker was Batman wasn't it...?) ~ Matticus78 00:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I actually bothered to check the two sites listed in the article (not that if they verified I would vote to keep) and nothing; BJAODN.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - BJAODN. Please don't let this gem be lost to BJAODN readers. - Richardcavell 00:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - WP:BJAODN, it got a chuckle, but totally non-encylopedic. --Doc Tropics 00:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. You've got to be kidding me right? BJK 00:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per CSD-A1 - patent nonsense. --Coredesat talk 01:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• WP:DAFT emphasis on the D. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 02:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete approaching the Crème de la Crème but not quite there, even though a few giggles were provoked. SM247 04:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Spidey Delete as patent nonsense, plus it is misspelt --DaveG12345 07:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete I laughed, but it's a delete. —Mets501 (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.